Source: American Journal of Public Health
Mental Illness, Mass Shootings, and the Politics of American Firearms
Jonathan M. Metzl, MD, PhD, and Kenneth T. MacLeish, PhD
Jonathan M. Metzl is with the Center for Medicine, Health, and Society and the Departments of Sociology and Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Kenneth T. MacLeish is with the Center for Medicine, Health, and Society and the Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University.
Contributors
Both authors conceptualized and designed the analysis and wrote and edited the article.
ABSTRACT
Four assumptions frequently arise in the aftermath of mass shootings in the United States: (1) that mental illness causes gun violence, (2) that psychiatric diagnosis can predict gun crime, (3) that shootings represent the deranged acts of mentally ill loners, and (4) that gun control “won’t prevent” another Newtown (Connecticut school mass shooting). Each of these statements is certainly true in particular instances. Yet, as we show, notions of mental illness that emerge in relation to mass shootings frequently reflect larger cultural stereotypes and anxieties about matters such as race/ethnicity, social class, and politics. These issues become obscured when mass shootings come to stand in for all gun crime, and when “mentally ill” ceases to be a medical designation and becomes a sign of violent threat.
A .pdf format of the article is available here.
Talking points, discussions, articles, columns and more, tracking the the campaign of David (the citizens of the Lincoln Village/Routier RD neighborhood) vs Goliath (the city of Rancho Cordova).
The protest is over the LOCATION of an indoor shooting range and gun store, moving into a vacant office building within 250 FEET of an existing high school; also an apartment complex, city park, senior citizens center, a community church, and single family homes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment